Jaxz RIP

24 comments

1. James · 1 Oct 2005
   God Corey how do you sleep at night, being such a damn abusive cheater? You were supposed to pre-arrange a 1v1 duel with Jaxz, using a sky scout of your own with precisely the same eq, level, stats, hp, instincts, skill levels, prep items, moves, xp tnl, and coins both on his person and in the bank. Only then would it have been fair.
   
   Oh, and need to have Mills Lane referee also, to ensure utter sportsmanship.
2. ddog · 1 Oct 2005
   crywhinequit
3. Rurh · 1 Oct 2005
   No, Corey, this would fall under the lame overpowered ambush on a single target category.
   
   And once that kill is done, you're off.
   
   Your flee and hide skills are second to none. You've got all those 1man rooms mapped out.
4. pablo · 1 Oct 2005
   rurh what's your idea of a good pk log? can you post some log so we learn from your skills?
5. Rurh · 1 Oct 2005
   "all those 1man rooms"
   
   It's plural. Go back to elementary school.
   
   Pablo:
   
   There are plenty of fair fight examples to choose from.
6. James · 1 Oct 2005
   Rurh: Do you see BSP bitching and moaning that Jaxz died? No. Jaxz was out hunting Corey, and knew full well the potential outcome. I don't see Sigils running around screaming OMFG COREY CHEATER either. Quit crying your fucking heart out for people who have accepted their deaths and are moving on.
7. Rurh · 1 Oct 2005
   Corey:
   
   If there was the necesary threat, you would have.
   
   So either way the risk wasn't that great.
   
   James:
   
   And I care?
   
   Keep trying to trivialize what I say into 'whining'. It's the "in" thing to do.
   
   See if it has any effect on me.
8. Rurh · 1 Oct 2005
   I didn't say I didn't understand WHY you take the actions you do.
   
   You're too attached to your equipment then, as well. Too scared to lose it?
   
   You shouldn't be talking about 'needlessly'. For a clan that "doesn't have the numbers" or a great many people to log, it seems odd that you'd wage war on EVERYONE. That was needless. You took Mavlad's spontaneous war syndrome to a whole new level.
   
   "There is one rule when you're in a war with me. I never lose."
   
   Considering how vague we are on what it means to 'win', what do you mean by 'lose'?
   
   There are a few logs of you dying. So if that's losing, I wouldn't say never.
   
   Cowards who hide in caves don't risk to lose much either. I should know.
9. Malth · 2 Oct 2005
   I swear to god, next time you cheat, corey, I'm going to make sure Aristox bans you! YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE! :(
   
   
   Hey Rurh, why don't you post a log of you pking to show us how it's done right?
   
   
   If 2v1 is lame overkill, then I guess you'd NEVER, EVER attack a solo enemy using a mage with summon monster, right? BEcause having a bashing charmie is unfair? Rurh, are you seriously this fucked up, or are you jsut fucking with us?
   
   
   This might come as a suprise, Rurh, but people generally like to win a fight, and enjoy their spoils. This means getting out of sight when there's a larger enemy presense on after you. I know the idea of tactics and strategy are unknown to your carebear ass, but I suggest getting a clue.
   
   Go read the art of war.
   Then go ask someone to write a "pk for dummies" book, so you can learn how to do it.
10. Wezlar · 2 Oct 2005
    it should be mentioned that all of Balboa Jaxz and Beluga were attacking Jansel. We were trying to ambush all 3. Should we have left Jaxz alone because gasp, it would be unfair? (Even though he was engaged in the GASP UNFAIR ATTACK OF ONE OF OUR FRIENDS?! ITS CLEAR NOWCLAN ARE THE DEFENDERS OF THE PURE AND INNOCENT. WE EMBRACED RURHS PHILOSOPHY AND DONATED ALL THE GOOD PIECES OF JAXZs EQ BACK TO BSR SO THEY COULD CONTINUE TO FIGHT THE FAIR FIGHT)
11. Attai · 2 Oct 2005
    I think it was because you felt sorry for Jaxz to be eq'less
12. mattafk · 2 Oct 2005
    I think Corey and Adam endanger themselves more often than anyone else on the mud. The fact that noone is capitalizing on that fact does not lessen the fact that they put themselves at risk often. What should they do, stand there and get killed by the bsp 10 man swooping down upon them? Though that would clearly be the correct thing to do, they were way too attached to their sets for something like that.
13. Rurh · 2 Oct 2005
    "Hey Rurh, why don't you post a log of you pking to show us how it's done right? "
    
    I refuse to pk. It's immoral, and I'll go to hell if I do it.
    
    I'll leave it at that.
    
    "This might come as a suprise, Rurh, but people generally like to win a fight, and enjoy their spoils."
    
    Well it isn't a suprise. I've never contested this aspect.
    
    " This means getting out of sight when there's a larger enemy presense on after you."
    
    And? I swear you're arguing with me on things that I agree with you on.
    
    "I know the idea of tactics and strategy are unknown to your carebear ass, but I suggest getting a clue."
    
    Carebears would kick your ass.
    
    Corey:
    "Rurh, don't you get tired of being wrong?"
    
    What does your heart tell you?
    
    Mattafk:
    
    "The fact that noone is capitalizing on that fact does not lessen the fact that they put themselves at risk often."
    
    Rarely a huge amount of risk. Just enough so they appear to be badass, when the actually arent.
    
    
    Btw, Ranisha is Corey.
    
14. ddog · 2 Oct 2005
    killing 1 person with many isnt stupid or lame, its effective. i couldnt care less if someone is whining over a game about something not being HONORARY or UNFAIR pkill, gee
15. Malth · 3 Oct 2005
    "Hey Rurh, why don't you post a log of you pking to show us how it's done right? "
    
    I refuse to pk. It's immoral, and I'll go to hell if I do it.
    
    
    You're going to hell already, the simple fact is you can't. pk worth shit, so shut the hell up about it when other do it.
    
    If you think PK is imooral, then I guess if I attack someone who can't recall, and they don't fight back, it'll be you.
    
    The reason it probably sunds like I'm arguing with you on 'things you agree on', is because your own arguements are self-defeating bullshit. You agree about hiding from a larger enemy presence, yet think it's BS to attack with superior numbers. This is what you are saying Rurh, now think about it, and maybe you'll understand why everyone, except maybe Derek, can't help but hate you.
16. Mike R. · 3 Oct 2005
    hey rurh, wouldn't posting someone's alternates in an attempt to get them killed ruin their hour(s) of playtime and destroy that character?
    
    what's your stance on destroying people's playtime again? or does that only count for everyone except corey?
17. kaldean · 3 Oct 2005
    You win alot Corey but 'never lose.' I just saw you rip your scout and mage to Sheerin yesterday.
18. ZexxFable · 3 Oct 2005
    Shut up Kaldean, I rip you all the time to the point that you rarely even log on now, and when I find your alts, they'll be going straight to hell as well. Pretty sad that Kaldean is hiding/running from big bad Zexx Fable! Ddog knows what the fuck he's talking about. Effectivness is the upmost key factor in life/gaming; if you aren't effective, you go no where and get nothing done. Being fair is something that is ficition and never done. Mavlad has 0 random wars by the way you jackass.
19. Seq · 4 Oct 2005
    i've always thought having fun was more important than being effective
20. kaldean · 4 Oct 2005
    Zexx what are you babbling about now? Im on everyday sadly enough and when was the last time you killed me? If i recall it was you who died last time not me, the only person whos killed me in awhile is corey so why dont you give it a rest you ugly unoriginal clan filler randoming fucking moron.
21. kaldean · 4 Oct 2005
    gotta agree with Seq, you may aswell quit if your not playing for fun.
22. Seq · 4 Oct 2005
    that applies to life as well!
23. jorake · 5 Oct 2005
    JERRY JERRY JERRY.
    
    I would have to say. For this being just a game. To many of you take it way to seriously.
    Corey Pks, so what. He dont zone, so what? Makes him kinda trashy i would guess. But he is good at what he does, cause you see more logs of him winning then losing, even if it is against 1-2peple. The more you have, the easier/smoother/SAFER it is to get the job done. Saying its trashy of him to ambush people is very ignorant. Its like sending 1 guy, and his gun into a war against thousands, And saying Go Get em. Of course he is gonna lose. But you send 2000 guys into a war against a 1000 obviously mor often then not, the 2000 guys are gonna win. Saftey in numbers.
    Stop fucking whining on this god damn site. Try sayikng Good job or bad luck or thats shitty. Stop being fucking lamers, and taking shit way to seriously.
    
    
    
    ITS A FUCKING GAME!
    
    
24. ddog · 7 Oct 2005
    well said whoever you are!